Survivor
Balanced pick
Cincinnati Bengals
vs. Tennessee Titans
82% League Read chance to advance Single elimination · Ties count as losses Win 81.6% · Tie 2.3% Odds, excluding ties: 84%Best in Week 8 and later
This team has the best Week 8 chance without weakening the strongest no-repeat plan across the remaining scheduled weeks.
- Expected score
- 28.0–15.8 Middle 80%: CIN 16.0–40.0; TEN 3.0–29.0
- Model evidence
- Established
- Pool survival
- 9.1%
Starting-quarterback scenarios use depth order and independent availability estimates. Their probability calibration has not yet been validated with dated injury and depth evidence.
Some starting-quarterback scenarios have no individual game history. Their forecasts use a rostered quarterback with game history and have limited evidence.
Game forecasts were last rebuilt 2026-10-30 16:34:28Z; a background refresh is pending.
Season map
Select a team in any week to record your pick or reserve it for a future plan. The outlined path updates around those choices.
No picks recorded yet. Select a team in the map to start.
| Team | Wk 1 | Wk 2 | Wk 3 | Wk 4 | Wk 5 | Wk 6 | Wk 7 | Wk 8 | Wk 9 | Wk 10 | Wk 11 | Wk 12 | Wk 13 | Wk 14 | Wk 15 | Wk 16 | Wk 17 | Wk 18 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARIArizona Cardinals | Bye | |||||||||||||||||
| ATLAtlanta Falcons | Bye | |||||||||||||||||
| BALBaltimore Ravens | Bye | |||||||||||||||||
| BUFBuffalo Bills | Bye | |||||||||||||||||
| CARCarolina Panthers | Bye | |||||||||||||||||
| CHIChicago Bears | Bye | |||||||||||||||||
| CINCincinnati Bengals | Bye | |||||||||||||||||
| CLECleveland Browns | Bye | |||||||||||||||||
| DALDallas Cowboys | Bye | |||||||||||||||||
| DENDenver Broncos | Bye | |||||||||||||||||
| DETDetroit Lions | Bye | |||||||||||||||||
| GBGreen Bay Packers | Bye | |||||||||||||||||
| HOUHouston Texans | Bye | |||||||||||||||||
| INDIndianapolis Colts | Bye | |||||||||||||||||
| JAXJacksonville Jaguars | Bye | |||||||||||||||||
| KCKansas City Chiefs | Bye | |||||||||||||||||
| LACLos Angeles Chargers | Bye | |||||||||||||||||
| LARLos Angeles Rams | Bye | |||||||||||||||||
| LVLas Vegas Raiders | Bye | |||||||||||||||||
| MIAMiami Dolphins | Bye | |||||||||||||||||
| MINMinnesota Vikings | Bye | |||||||||||||||||
| NENew England Patriots | Bye | |||||||||||||||||
| NONew Orleans Saints | Bye | |||||||||||||||||
| NYGNew York Giants | Bye | |||||||||||||||||
| NYJNew York Jets | Bye | |||||||||||||||||
| PHIPhiladelphia Eagles | Bye | |||||||||||||||||
| PITPittsburgh Steelers | Bye | |||||||||||||||||
| SEASeattle Seahawks | Bye | |||||||||||||||||
| SFSan Francisco 49ers | Bye | |||||||||||||||||
| TBTampa Bay Buccaneers | Bye | |||||||||||||||||
| TENTennessee Titans | Bye | |||||||||||||||||
| WASWashington Commanders | Bye |
75%+ strong
65–74% viable
55–64% thin
Below 55%
✓ Plan Optimized path
Safest Best raw chance
Leading or won
Trailing or lost
Started games show the live or final score and update while games are played. “Forecast unavailable” means the scheduled game is known but its forecast is not ready. “No matchup shown” means the schedule for that week is missing; verify the game before recording. Future reservations require a known matchup.
Pool settings · Balanced
Recommended remaining path
Balanced · Single elimination. This scenario honors your reserved teams and updates when forecasts, rules, or picks change.
- Week 8 CIN vs. TEN 82%
- Week 9 SF vs. LV 84%
- Week 10 LAR at ARI 81%
- Week 11 KC vs. ARI 82%
- Week 12 JAX vs. TEN 83%
- Week 13 SEA vs. DAL 81%
- Week 14 DET vs. TEN 79%
- Week 15 DEN at LV 73%
- Week 16 MIN vs. WAS 79%
- Week 17 PIT at TEN 77%
- Week 18 BUF vs. NYJ 85%
Week 8 choices
Ranked by pool-survival probability under the selected pool rules. The Balanced recommendation applies the selected style after every no-repeat path is scored.
| Pick | Matchup | Advance | Odds (no tie) | Expected | Future leverage | Pool survival |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cincinnati Bengals #1 in Week 8 ✓ Plan pick Highest advance chance | vs. Tennessee Titans |
81.6%
Win 81.6% · Tie 2.3%
|
83.8% LR 0 pp, excluding ties | 28.0–15.8 80%: 16.0–40.0 / 3.0–29.0 | Use now 0% future-path cost | 9.1% |
| Pittsburgh Steelers #3 in Week 8 | vs. Cleveland Browns |
76.5%
Win 76.5% · Tie 2.0%
|
63.1% LR +15 pp, excluding ties | 27.7–18.5 80%: 16.0–40.0 / 5.0–32.0 | Save for Wk 17 5% future-path cost | 8.1% |
| Buffalo Bills #2 in Week 8 | vs. Baltimore Ravens |
76.8%
Win 76.8% · Tie 2.3%
|
60.9% LR +18 pp, excluding ties | 29.7–20.7 80%: 18.0–42.0 / 7.0–34.0 | Save for Wk 18 6% future-path cost | 8.1% |
| New England Patriots | at Miami Dolphins |
72.1%
Win 72.1% · Tie 2.1%
|
73.5% LR 0 pp, excluding ties | 30.1–23.2 80%: 16.0–44.0 / 11.0–36.0 | Low 0% future-path cost | 8.1% |
| Jacksonville Jaguars | vs. Indianapolis Colts |
75.6%
Win 75.6% · Tie 1.6%
|
79.5% LR -3 pp, excluding ties | 30.2–20.9 80%: 18.0–43.0 / 7.0–35.0 | Save for Wk 12 12% future-path cost | 7.5% |
| Dallas Cowboys | vs. Arizona Cardinals |
65.3%
Win 65.3% · Tie 4.3%
|
73.8% LR -6 pp, excluding ties | 29.6–23.6 80%: 18.0–42.0 / 10.0–37.0 | Low 0% future-path cost | 7.3% |
| Tampa Bay Buccaneers | vs. Atlanta Falcons |
63.5%
Win 63.5% · Tie 1.9%
|
55.6% LR +9 pp, excluding ties | 27.4–22.4 80%: 16.0–40.0 / 9.0–36.0 | Low 0% future-path cost | 7.1% |
| Los Angeles Rams | vs. Los Angeles Chargers |
66.7%
Win 66.7% · Tie 3.4%
|
71.7% LR -3 pp, excluding ties | 31.0–25.0 80%: 19.0–43.0 / 12.0–38.0 | Save for Wk 10 8% future-path cost | 6.9% |
| Seattle Seahawks | vs. Chicago Bears |
68.9%
Win 68.9% · Tie 3.0%
|
60.7% LR +10 pp, excluding ties | 27.4–20.2 80%: 16.0–40.0 / 7.0–34.0 | Save for Wk 13 15% future-path cost | 6.6% |
| Minnesota Vikings | at Detroit Lions |
56.3%
Win 56.3% · Tie 4.7%
|
38.8% LR +20 pp, excluding ties | 26.4–24.0 80%: 13.0–40.0 / 12.0–36.0 | Save for Wk 16 7% future-path cost | 5.9% |
| Kansas City Chiefs | at Denver Broncos |
50.3%
Win 50.3% · Tie 2.0%
|
52.3% LR -1 pp, excluding ties | 24.3–24.6 80%: 11.0–38.0 / 13.0–37.0 | Save for Wk 11 0% future-path cost | 5.6% |
| New York Jets | vs. Las Vegas Raiders |
49.9%
Win 49.9% · Tie 1.7%
|
52.3% LR -2 pp, excluding ties | 22.3–21.4 80%: 10.0–35.0 / 8.0–35.0 | Low 0% future-path cost | 5.6% |
| Washington Commanders | vs. Philadelphia Eagles |
49.1%
Win 49.1% · Tie 2.2%
|
69.8% LR -20 pp, excluding ties | 22.1–21.4 80%: 10.0–34.0 / 8.0–35.0 | Low 0% future-path cost | 5.5% |
| Philadelphia Eagles | at Washington Commanders |
48.7%
Win 48.7% · Tie 2.2%
|
30.2% LR +20 pp, excluding ties | 21.4–22.1 80%: 8.0–35.0 / 10.0–34.0 | Low 0% future-path cost | 5.5% |
| Las Vegas Raiders | at New York Jets |
48.4%
Win 48.4% · Tie 1.7%
|
47.7% LR +2 pp, excluding ties | 21.4–22.3 80%: 8.0–35.0 / 10.0–35.0 | Low 0% future-path cost | 5.4% |
| Denver Broncos | vs. Kansas City Chiefs |
47.7%
Win 47.7% · Tie 2.0%
|
47.7% LR +1 pp, excluding ties | 24.6–24.3 80%: 13.0–37.0 / 11.0–38.0 | Save for Wk 15 3% future-path cost | 5.2% |
| Detroit Lions | vs. Minnesota Vikings |
39.0%
Win 39.0% · Tie 4.7%
|
61.2% LR -20 pp, excluding ties | 24.0–26.4 80%: 12.0–36.0 / 13.0–40.0 | Save for Wk 14 9% future-path cost | 4.0% |
| Atlanta Falcons | at Tampa Bay Buccaneers |
34.6%
Win 34.6% · Tie 1.9%
|
44.4% LR -9 pp, excluding ties | 22.4–27.4 80%: 9.0–36.0 / 16.0–40.0 | Low 0% future-path cost | 3.9% |
| Arizona Cardinals | at Dallas Cowboys |
30.4%
Win 30.4% · Tie 4.3%
|
26.2% LR +6 pp, excluding ties | 23.6–29.6 80%: 10.0–37.0 / 18.0–42.0 | Low 0% future-path cost | 3.4% |
| Los Angeles Chargers | at Los Angeles Rams |
29.9%
Win 29.9% · Tie 3.4%
|
28.3% LR +3 pp, excluding ties | 25.0–31.0 80%: 12.0–38.0 / 19.0–43.0 | Low 0% future-path cost | 3.4% |
| Chicago Bears | at Seattle Seahawks |
28.1%
Win 28.1% · Tie 3.0%
|
39.3% LR -10 pp, excluding ties | 20.2–27.4 80%: 7.0–34.0 / 16.0–40.0 | Low 0% future-path cost | 3.1% |
| Miami Dolphins | vs. New England Patriots |
25.9%
Win 25.9% · Tie 2.1%
|
26.5% LR 0 pp, excluding ties | 23.2–30.1 80%: 11.0–36.0 / 16.0–44.0 | Low 0% future-path cost | 2.9% |
| Indianapolis Colts | at Jacksonville Jaguars |
22.8%
Win 22.8% · Tie 1.6%
|
20.5% LR +3 pp, excluding ties | 20.9–30.2 80%: 7.0–35.0 / 18.0–43.0 | Low 0% future-path cost | 2.6% |
| Cleveland Browns | at Pittsburgh Steelers |
21.4%
Win 21.4% · Tie 2.0%
|
36.9% LR -15 pp, excluding ties | 18.5–27.7 80%: 5.0–32.0 / 16.0–40.0 | Low 0% future-path cost | 2.4% |
| Baltimore Ravens | at Buffalo Bills |
20.9%
Win 20.9% · Tie 2.3%
|
39.1% LR -18 pp, excluding ties | 20.7–29.7 80%: 7.0–34.0 / 18.0–42.0 | Low 0% future-path cost | 2.3% |
| Tennessee Titans | at Cincinnati Bengals |
16.1%
Win 16.1% · Tie 2.3%
|
16.2% LR 0 pp, excluding ties | 15.8–28.0 80%: 3.0–29.0 / 16.0–40.0 | Low 0% future-path cost | 1.8% |
How League Read builds this plan
- Our forecast
- League Read projects passing, rushing, receiving, kicking, and defense from earlier player performance and the expected active roster. Earlier opponent-adjusted team results can supply context, but never replace the player and roster model or become a direct prior-season multiplier. The current production model uses a fixed regularized score formula fitted on earlier games. The fitted score and 4,096 deterministic score simulations produce separate win, tie, and loss estimates. Equal simulated scores count as ties; this tie rate has not been separately calibrated for NFL overtime. A missing kicker identity uses a recent baseline instead of zero and lowers the evidence label. Bookmaker lines do not enter this forecast.
- Coaching
- Coaching effects are not modeled yet because League Read does not retain dated head-coach, coordinator, and play-caller assignments. The forecast does not infer historical assignments from names or current staff pages.
- Odds comparison
- Available moneylines are converted to a no-vig consensus. If moneylines are unavailable, the page can show a spread-derived estimate. Odds and the League Read comparison delta are conditional on a decisive result, excluding ties. They are separate from the chance to advance under your pool rules and never change the League Read forecast.
- No-repeat plan
- The planner assigns a different team to every remaining scheduled week. With no mulligans it exactly maximizes the chance of advancing every week; with mulligans it searches no-repeat paths for the strongest chance of finishing within the available covered-loss limit. Expired mulligans cannot cover later losses. A tie either counts as a loss or advances the entry without consuming a mulligan, according to your selection. Either outcome uses that team; void picks and team reuse are not modeled.
- Plan styles
- Safe now takes the highest current-week chance to advance. Balanced maximizes modeled pool survival. Future-first protects later options only among plans within 5 current-week percentage points and 2% of Balanced.
- Future leverage
- Future-path cost measures how much the strongest future-only assignment weakens when that team is consumed this week. High begins at a 5% relative reduction; medium begins at 1%.
- Validation
- The latest rolling check covers 272 games from 2025, with a strict-home-win Brier score of 0.228 and margin error of 10.3 points.